/
Stories
/
Interview

Between Seed and Tree: Hiền Hoàng in Conversation with Taco Hidde Bakker

Exploring tree scanning, virtual reality, colonial botany and archival collections.

Words by
Taco Hidde Bakker
|
April 3, 2025

Hiền Hoàng, a Vietnamese expatriate living and working in Germany, describes herself as a multimedia artist. In 2024 she was awarded the Paul Huf Award, an acclaimed photography prize. Photography, however, is only one of the many elements that constitute Hoàng’s multifaceted artistic practice. Furthermore she experiments with video, VR (virtual reality) and AR (augmented reality), performance, installation and scientific data, typically combining various media within projects. As she writes in a statement on her website, her work creates "multisensory experiences that uncover unseen narratives and explore ecological and emotional connections." I visited Hoàng in February 2025 in her temporary studio at the Futures Hub in Amsterdam to learn more about her artistic research processes. The studio was scattered with, among others, tree logs (some of them provided with sensors), tree bark, a handwritten parallel timeline of relationships between Vietnam and the German Democratic Republic (including the arrival of Hoàng's aunt as a guest worker) and colonial botany, several books and printed articles about the intersections of botany and colonialism and, wrapped around a tripod, a long piece of textile printed with data. Hoàng is expanding her project Garden of Entanglement and preparing for her upcoming exhibition at Foam in Amsterdam (6 June – 24 August 2025). 

No items found.
No items found.
No items found.

 Taco Hidde Bakker (THB):

I would love to learn more about how you conduct your research as an artist.

Your practice touches on many things, both thematically and materially, with multiple outcomes. Could you describe what happens once you have found the seed of an idea, and how you help that seed grow into bigger artistic trees?

Hiền Hoàng (HH):

I like how you describe it: an idea as a seed growing into artistic trees. When I come across something intriguing, I begin with research and ask whether it aligns with my current practice or expands it in new directions. I’m often drawn to contradictions and yet the intertwining of life and death, beauty and destruction, the vastness of the world versus the fragility of human existence. I try to follow the threads, connecting the dots, but I also embrace the beauty of things happening spontaneously.

THB:

You've told me that you're currently engaged in collaborations with scientists. I'm curious as to how artistic-scientific collaborations take shape and how they might mutually inform two practices that are different in many respects. How do your collaborations inform your artistic research and practice. And what do scientists learn in return?

HH:

My collaborations with scientists initially happened organically, as I came across several scientific papers during my research, such as studies on tree scanning, vibration measurement, and environmental data collection. With my project Garden of Entanglement from last year, I began working more intensively with researchers from the University of Florence and the University of Stuttgart. I believe that both scientists and artists share a deep, almost obsessive curiosity for their respective niches. This creates a common ground despite our different approaches. For me, working with scientific methods leads to questions about subjectivity and digital perception. For example, what does it mean to translate a living subject, like a tree, into data? How do we observe things with our own eyes versus how a computer perceives them? These questions push me to think about the limits of representation and the gap between reality and its possible digital reconstruction. In return, I think in art-science collaborations scientists could gain different perspectives—shifts in how they approach their own research. In my latest project Garden of Entanglement, for example, our work inspired the researcher from the University of Florence to experiment with different frequencies and activities to study the natural vibrations of trees in novel ways. We are also writing a research paper together based on this collaboration and we're looking into further developments in this area.

No items found.

THB:

I see that for you're current research you've collected multiple books and articles on botany and colonialism. You've also been visiting several museums and archives during your brief stay in the Netherlands, besides locating several special trees in the city and beyond. How does your visiting of museums and archives and doing bibliographical research entwine with your artistic process?

HH:

In my earlier work, I incorporated personal archival materials, such as photos, letters and objects which I had found in my aunt’s house. I placed them in installations and photo sets alongside other elements, so that I could question their meaning and symbolism. Currently, I approach archives from a more critical perspective: Who created them? For what purpose were they created? Who was their intended audience? Is there anything missing in these collections? I’ve encountered challenges in my research during my time in Amsterdam, partly due to time constraints, but also because information about the Japanese Pagoda tree is inherently incomplete. However, I find these gaps compelling. As an artist, I’m not just looking for what’s there, but also for what is absent—what has been erased or left out. It could leave space for questions and speculation, allowing for imagined scenarios and new narratives. Sometimes, the most interesting aspects of things lie in what cannot be seen.

THB:

A final question about your final steps in the artistic process, before you publicize your work. I already witnessed a transformation from your 'wild' studio setting on the afternoon of my visit to an 'open studio' setting the evening after, where you arranged things a little different. Because your work consists of such diverse thematic strands besides various techniques and media, I wonder how you decide how to weave them together for public presentations.

HH: 

About the installation for the open studio: usually I work with quite a clear concept in mind. I would, for example, sketch things out or create a 3D mockup of the installation. But this time, during the residency, I chose to embrace the ongoing nature of my research. Rather than fixating on a fixed concept, I gathered all the materials I had been working with – prints, objects, fragments and texts – and let them speak to each other. It also helped that I was living with the works. After waking up, I would walk straight into the studio, kind of immersing myself in the atmosphere of the space and all the elements it contained. I guess that allowed me to trace the threads between the various media and ideas. When I began arranging the installation, I focused on building a composition through contrast, paying attention to heights, textures, and rhythms between the materials. In the end, I wanted the audience not only to look at my work, but to step into it and the process itself.

No items found.
No items found.
No items found.
No items found.
No items found.